Shyamrao S/O Vithalrao Nikhade v. Vimla Wd/O Deepakchand Vaishya, Nagpur And Another
wp.798.16 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.798 OF 2016 (Shyamrao Vithalrao Nikhade vs.
Vimla wd/o Deepakchand Vaishya and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
CORAM
: Z.A. HAQ, J.
DATE : 20 th JUNE, 2016.
Heard Shri A.V. Muley, learned Advocate for the petitioner-original defendant and Shri S.S. Sitani, learned Advocate for the respondents-original plaintiffs. The impugned oder rejecting the application (Exhibit-29) filed by the petitioner for impounding the tenancy agreement, is an interlocutory order. I am not inclined to interfere with it at this stage in the extraordinary jurisdiction.
Keeping the issue open for consideration by the trial Court at relevant stage, the petition is disposed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE *sdw