← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2378/2022disposedoff

Ghanshyamdas Sanghidas Panpaliya v. The Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur And Another

2022-05-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Karnik1 pages

1 74 wp 2378.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2378 OF 2022 Ghanshyamdas Sanghidas Panpaliya ..vs..

The Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur and anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.A.Naik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri M.A. Kadu, A.G.P. for respondent no. 1.

Shri C.S. Dharmadhikari, Advocate for respondent no. 2. CORAM :

M.S. KARNIK, J.

DATED :

04/05/2022.

Learned Counsel for the parties submitted that the dispute is settled and a joint affidavit for and on behalf of the petitioner and respondent no. 2, bringing on record the terms of settlement of the present dispute arrived at between them is placed on record. The Affidavit is duly verified by the respective parties.

2.

The petitioner Ghanshyamdas Sanghidas Panapaliya and respondent no. 2 Hamzabhai M.R.S. Chimthanwala are present in the Court. They are identified by their advocates appearing for them. They agree to the terms of settlement mentioned in the joint affidavit. The petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement terms mentioned in the joint affidavit filed on behalf of the parties. 3.

The parties to abide by the settlement terms and conditions mentioned in the affidavit.

4.

The petition is disposed of in the aforestated terms.

JU DGE TRUPTI SANTOSHJI AGRAWAL 05.05.2022 12:45 Trupti