Bombay High CourtCAO/102/2017admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Courts On Its Motion v. The Union Of India And Others

2017-01-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

pil.30.16 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAO] No.102 of 2017 in Public Interest Litigation No.30 of 2016 (Court on its own motion vs.

The Union of India, through its Ministry of Steel and Mines, New Delhi and others) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mrs. Bharti Dangre, Government Pleader for Res. Nos.1 & 2. CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 23 rd JANUARY, 2017.

This is an application for extension of time for complying with the order of this Court dated 18/10/2016. Mrs. Dangre, learned Government Pleader states that initially Shri Ravindra Kadam, the Special Inspector General of Police (Nagpur Range), was the Chairman of the Inquiry Committee. It is submitted that most of the inspections and meeting were held under his chairmanship. It is, however, further submitted that Shri Ravindra Kadam has been transferred to Pune and now the deponent Shri Pratapsingh Patankar has taken over the office of the Special Inspector General of Police, Nagpur. It is further submitted that he will have to conduct the inspection afresh and thereafter the report would be submitted.

pil.30.16 2 We find that almost the work was completed under the chairmanship of Shri Ravindra Kadam and on the ground of the transfer of the Officer, the work, which has already been completed, should not go in waste. We, therefore, direct that the remaining work of the Inquiry Committee should also be completed under the chairmanship of Shri Ravindra Kadam and the report be submitted to this Court.

In view of the aforesaid observations, we are inclined to grant extension by four weeks, as requested. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE *sdw