← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/829/2015dismissedrule discharged

Andeo Vithoba Dongre And Another v. Deputy Charity Commissioner, Nagpur And 8 Others

2017-07-19Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun Digambarrao Upadhye1 pages

WP829-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 829/2015 (ANDEO VITHOBA DONGRE & ANOTHER VERSUS THE DEPUTY CHARITY COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioners.

Mrs. H.Prabhu, A.G.P. for the R-1, 3, 5 & 7.

Shri Sk.Majid, counsel for the R-2.

Shri A.Y. Kapgate, counsel for the R-6.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND A.D. UPADHYE, JJ.

DATE : JULY 19 , 2017.

None appeared for the petitioners on 06.07.2017. None appears for the petitioners, today also. Since we had rejected the prayer for interim relief, it is most likely that the cause for filing the writ petition must have been rendered infructuous and, hence, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE