← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/245/2024ca disposed off

Prakash S/O Dnyaneshwar Darokar v. Ajay S/O Warlal Pawar And Others

2024-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Anandrao Deshmukh2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:8585 27=CAO 245-24 in MCAst 1330-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 245 OF 2024 IN MISC. APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 1330 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 3592 OF 2023 (D) PRAKASH S/O DNYANESHWAR DAROKAR -Vs. - AJAY S/O WARLAL PAWAR AND ANOTHER Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Ms. Shreya Bhagat, Advocate h/f. Shri P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for appellant. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH , J.

DATED : 02/08/ The present application is filed for condonation of delay of 141 days caused in preferring the application for restoration of appeal which was dismissed for non-removal of office objection.

2.

Perused the application.

3.

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. As such, the application is allowed. Delay in preferring the application for restoration of appeal is hereby condoned. 5.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

27=CAO 245-24 in MCAst 1330-24.odt MISC. APPLICATION (ST.) NO.

This is an application for restoration of appeal. 2.

Perused the application.

3.

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant.

4.

The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that he may remove office objection within two weeks. 5.

Subject to removal of office objection within two weeks, the application deserves to be allowed. As such, the application is allowed.

6.

After removal of office objection, the appeal be restored accordingly.

7.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) B.T. Khapekar