Ku. Mandakini Mahadeorao Takarkhede, Amravati v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary, Dept Of School Education, Mumbai And Others

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 503/2016 (Ku.Mandakini Mahadeorao Takarkhede vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ) .............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Mr. B.G.Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Vishal Gangane, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1,2 and 5 Ms. R.D.Raskar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 1st August, 2016 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has tendered the compromise pursis in the Court, today. The same is accepted on record.

The compromise pursis is signed by the petitioner, the respondent no.4 and the President of the Education Society, on behalf of the Management. The compromise pursis is signed by the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent no.3 and 4.

The learned counsel state that the Writ Petition could be disposed of in terms of the compromise pursis. Hence, we dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the compromise pursis, that would be binding on the petitioner and the

respondent nos.3 and 4. No order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE sahare

C E R T I F I C A T E "

and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order." Uploaded by: N.B.Sahare P.S.

Uploaded on: 03.08.2016.