← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/762/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Vilas A. Deshmukh v. State Of Mah., Through Its Secretary, Education Dept. And 3 Others

2015-10-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

WP762-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 762/2015 (VILAS A. DESHMUKH VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Kshirsagar, counsel for the petitioner. Shri D.M. Kale, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri A.S. Deshpande, counsel for the R-2 & 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 5 , 2015.

By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order of the respondent no.2, dated 05.08.2014, directing the absorption of the petitioner in Panchayat Samiti, Manora.

Since it was submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to get absorbed in Panchayat Samiti, Karanja, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 had sought time to seek necessary instructions. It is submitted on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3 that the Zilla Parishad is ready to absorb the petitioner in Lohara Primary School in Panchayat Samiti, Karanja. It is stated that the petitioner would be absorbed in the school at Lohara within a period of two weeks. Shri Kshirsagar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed in view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3. By accepting the statement made by the respondent nos.2 and 3, which would be binding on them, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE