← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/106/2023disposed off

Ahmad S/O. Karim Bhai Sheikh v. Nitin S/O. Baliram Kambale

2023-04-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. A. Sanap3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIM INAL WRIT PETITION NO. 106 OF 2023 Ahmad s/o Karim Bhai Sheikh .Vs.

Nitin s/o Baliram Kamale _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Shri S.W. Sambre, Advocate along with Shri K.S. Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri A.V. Muley, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM :

G.A. SANAP, J.

DATE :

APRIL 13, 2023.

1.

Heard learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the record and proceedings.

2.

This writ petition can be disposed of in view of the statements made by Advocates for the parties across the bar.

3.

Learned Advocate for the complainant/respondent concedes that in the application made under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 no specific reason was stated. It is seen that since the reason is not stated in the application, learned Magistrate had no occasion to deal with that part of the

matter on merits.

4.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that first and foremost reason must be mentioned in the application and same must be considered by the learned Magistrate while passing the order one way or the other. In this case has stated about there was no question of considering the reason while deciding the application inasmuch as the reasons was not stated in the application. 5.

The learned Advocate for the respondent submits that complainant has submitted his evidence on affidavit. He submits that the matter is listed for further examination-in-chief and cross examination of the complainant by the accused. Learned Advocate fairly concedes that this order may be set aside and the necessary directions be issued to the learned Judge to dispose of the matter expeditiously.

6.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that since the matter is part heard, his client cannot object for expeditious hearing of the case.

7.

In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside. The application in question is dismissed. However, in view of the statements made as above the learned Magistrate is requested to dispose of the criminal complaint expeditiously and in any case within a period of six months from today.

8.

Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(G. A. SANAP, J.) manisha Signed By:MANISHA ALOK SHEWALE