← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPR/16/2024allowed

Pravin Laxmanrao Meshram v. Swapna W/O. Pravin Meshram

2024-12-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar Chandrabhan More2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:13848

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO.16 OF 2024 (DELAY) IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2024 PRAVIN LAXMANRAO MESHRAM VS SWAPNA W/O. PRAVIN MESHRAM ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

Mr. M.P. Kariya, Advocate for the applicant Mr. A.A. Pande, Advocate (appointed) for the non-applicant -------------------------------

CORAM

: SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 17 th December, 2024.

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicant-husband is seeking condonation of delay of 733 days in filing the revision application before this Court against the order whereby the maintenance, amount granted to non-applicant/wife is enhanced to Rs.10,000/- per month by the learned Family Court, from the earlier maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month. 3.

The learned counsel for the applicant-husband submits that the applicant was admitted in rehabilitation centre due to his habit of consuming alcohol and when the impugned order was passed, he was in the said centre itself. He further submits that there was no opportunity to him to contest the matter on merit and with intent to deprive him from such opportunity, somebody fraudulently appeared on his behalf.

THAWRE

4.

On the contrary, the learned counsel for the nonapplicant/wife strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is huge delay, which remained unexplained.

5.

However, it is to be noted that though there are huge arrears of maintenance to the tune of Rs.5,50,000/- approximately, but there is no stay granted in favour of the applicant-husband and the recovery proceeding filed by the wife is going on.

6.

At this juncture, considering the fact that the impugned judgment was passed exparte against the applicant-husband, the delay of 733 days can be condoned in the interest of justice and by keeping in mind the principles of natural justice.

7.

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the delay of 733 days in filing appeal against the impugned judgment stands condoned. The revision application is already registered.

8.

The fees for the appointed Advocate on behalf of the non-applicant/wife be quantified as per the Rules. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) THAWRE