Lucky S/O Sunder Ganvir v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Gittikhadan Nagpur

1 1appa190.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 190/2023 in CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.648/2023 (Lucky S/o Sunder Ganvir Vs. State of Maharashtra) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.M. Balpande, Advocate for applicant.

Mrs. M. Deshmukh, APP for non-applicant.

CORAM: VINAY JOSHI AND VALMIKI SA MENEZES JJ.

DATED : 14/02/2023.

Heard.

2.

A convict seeks for condonation of delay of 240 days challenging the order of conviction. He has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and he is in Jail. Considering the said aspect and the reasons stated in the application, delay stands condoned.

3.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.648/2023 1.

Heard.

2.

The appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life along with fine with default clause.

3.

We have gone through the reasons assigned by the Trial Court while arriving on the conclusion of holding appellant guilty.

2 1appa190.23 4.

Admit.

5.

The learned counsel APP appearing for the respondent/State waives service of notice.

6.

Call for R. and P.

( VALMIKI SA MENEZES , J.) (VINAY JOSHI, J.) Gohane Digitally signed by JITENDRA BHARAT GOHANE Date:

2023.02.15 12:48:53 +0530 JITENDRA BHARAT GOHANE