Bombay High CourtCAW/377/2014admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Divisional Controller, Yavatmal v. Shri Ajay Prabhakarrao Gaikwad And Another

2015-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 caw377.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.377 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2120 OF 2012 (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, through its Divisional Controller, Yavatmal ..vs.. Shri Ajay Prabhakarrao Gaikwad and another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATED : 09-09-2015 Heard Shri V.H. Kedar, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mrs. A.R. Taiwade, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.2.

For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that the application is not opposed by the respondent No.1 inasmuch the reply is not filed, the petitioner is permitted to amend the petition.

The civil application is allowed accordingly. JUDGE pma