Ku. Vaishali Uttamrao Shrirame v. The State Of Mahrashtra, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mumbai

28.06.caw.376.16

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.376/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1498/2014 (Ku. Vaishali Uttamrao Shrirame vs. State of Maharashtra and others ) .............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. None for the applicant Shrimati Kalyani Deshpande, Asst. Govt.Pleader for Respondent no.1 Shri Abhijit Deshpande, Adv. for Respondent no.2 Shri S.R.Renu, Advocate for Respondent no.3 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A.NAIK & MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 28th June, 2016 Heard.

By this Civil Application, the applicant seeks a direction to the Principal of the College to return the original mark-sheet of the applicant/petitioner with T.C.

By our order dated 13rd October, 2015 we had directed the original respondent no.3 Principal of the College, to provisionally return the mark-sheets. The learned counsel for the respondent no.3 states that the mark-sheets that were in possession of the respondent no.3 i.e. SSC mark-sheet, HSC mark-sheet and BCA examination marks sheet are returned to the petitionerapplicant. It is stated that the domicile certificate

28.06.caw.376.16 and the nationality certificate was also returned to the applicant. It is stated that the mark-sheets of the MCA examination are withheld by the University. It is stated that the respondent no.3 has complied with the order.

In the circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to grant the prayer made in the Application. If the order dated 13th October, 2015 is not complied, the petitioner/applicant has other remedies. If it is complied and certain other direction is required, the petitioner-applicant is free to file an appropriate Application.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the Civil Application.

JUDGE JUDGE sahare