← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/285/2025allowed

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Depot Manager, Wardha v. Lata Wd/O Janardhan Dhale And Others

2025-08-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

1 15caf285.2025..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 285 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1284 OF 2024 (Mah. State Road Transport Vs. Smt. Lata wd/o Janardhan Dhale and ors ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.R.S. Charpe, Advocate for appellant.

Mr. A.R. Rishi, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATED : 04-08-2025 Heard.

2.

The applicant/respondent No. 2 has filed this application to correct her name in the appeal memo as 'Meena w/o Madhukarrao Dhokane' instead of 'Meena w/o Madhukarrao Lohokare, for which learned counsel for the appellant has no objection, as the Registrar (J) has supported the contentions of the applicant. 3.

It also appears that by order dated 05.02.2025, this Court has directed the Registrar (J) to verify the facts about the controversy of the name of the applicant and submit his report. Accordingly, Registrar (J) has submitted his report stating that the name of respondent No. 2 was mentioned in the claim petition as 'Meena Madhukar Dhokane'; however, in the judgment of the Tribunal and appeal memo, the said name was mentioned as 'Meena Madhukar Lohokare'. In view of the same and no objection of the applicant as well as perusal of a copy of the Aadhar Card, I found substance in the contentions of the learned counsel for the applicant, in that regard. Hence, the application is allowed as prayed.

2 15caf285.2025..odt 4.

The appellant is directed to correct the name of respondent No. 2 as 'Meena Madhukar Dhokane' instead of 'Meena Madhukar Lohokare', and upon carrying out the amendment, shall supply a copy of the amended appeal memo to the other side. 5.

List the matter in due course.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Belkhede