← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1869/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Sarojbala Wd/O Chandrashekhar Chaurasia v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Housing And Area Development Dept., Mumbai And Another

2016-02-03Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1869/2015 Smt. Sarojbala wd/o Chandrashekhar Chaurasia ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Housing and Area Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.A. Vaidya, Advocate for petitioner Shri A.S. Fulzele, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : 03.02.2016 By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction that the respondent no.2 should decide the application for mutation filed by the petitioner.

According to the petitioner, certain deficiencies were pointed out on 7.10.2014 but thereafter though the same were removed, the application was not decided.

Shri A.S. Fulzele, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents, on instructions, states that the application in question has been rejected on 16.3.2015. Statement is accepted. In case the petitioner is aggrieved by aforesaid adjudication, she is free to challenge the same, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar