Bombay High CourtWP/2339/2015dismissedrule discharged

The Union Of India, Thr. General Manager And ANR v. Madhav Natthu Bhandakkar

2015-08-31Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

1 wp2339.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2339 OF 2015 [The Union of India and one .vs. Madhav Natthu Bhandakkar] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. R.S. Sundaram, counsel a/w Ms. U.R. Tanna, counsel for the petitioners, Shri Anil Bambal, counsel for the respondent. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATED : AUGUST 31, 2015.

The learned counsel for the petitioners fairly states that the issue involved in this case stands answered against the petitioners and in favour of the respondent by the judgment dated 26.8.2015 in Writ Petition No.886/2015 [The Union of India, through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai CST, Mumbai and another .vs. Satyabhamabai Dashrath Raghunath]. Hence, for the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 26.8.2015 in Writ Petition No.886/2015, we dismiss the writ petition, with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande