← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/875/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Panjabrao S/O. Ramrao Deshmukh, Yavatmal v. Dy. Director Of Education, Amravati Division, Amravati And Others

2016-07-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp875.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2016 [Panjabrao s/o Ramrao Deshmukh .vs. Dy. Director of Education and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Rugved Dhore, counsel for the petitioner, Shri N.R. Rode, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3, Shri Pravin S. Patil, counsel for respondent nos.4 to 8. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : JULY 05, 2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction against the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Yavatmal to decide the representation of the petitioner. Shri Patil, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 to 8, states that the representation of the petitioner is decided on 13.4.2016 and the petitioner is aware about the same. The learned counsel tendered a copy of the said decision in the court for perusal.

In view of the statement made on behalf of the respondent nos.4 to 8, we dispose of the writ petition, with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande