Saibaba Matsya Vyavasayak Sahakari Society Limited, Through Its President, Shri Suleman Gulab v. State Of Mah., Thr.Honble Commissioner For Fisheries And Additional Registrar, Co-Op. So., And ORS

caw298.22.O.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.

IN WRIT PETITION NO.703 OF 2018 (D) (Saibaba Matsya Vyavsayik Sahakari Society Limited, Pimpalner, Tq. Lonar, Dist. Buldhana Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Hon'ble Commissioner for Fisheries & Additional Registrar, Co-operative Societies (Fisheries), Mumbai and others) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. K. Tambe, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S. M. Ukey, Addl. GP for Respondents 1 to 3/State. Mr. A. P. Kalmegh, Advocate for Respondent 4. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO , J.

DATE: 14 th FEBRUARY, .

This application is filed for "speaking to minutes" in respect of an order dated 01.02.2022 which itself was an order passed on Civil Application (W) 170/2022 in Writ Petition 703/2018, for speaking to minutes.

2.

All that is done vide order dated 01.02.2022 is recording of the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent 4 that the respondent 4 society is already registered as regards the Pimpalner Tank as far back as in 1982. The addition to the order directed while allowing speaking to minutes reads thus:

"According to respondent 4 society it is already registered as regards the Pimpalner Tank as far back as in 1982".

caw298.22.O.odt 3.

The present application is filed on the premise that the respondent 4 society was not as a fact registered in respect of the Pimpalner Tank.

4.

This application is clearly misconceived and frivolous, to put it conservatively. All that is done by the earlier order is to record a submission. This Court has not recorded a finding either way.

5.

The application is dismissed.

JUDGE NSN SHIVNARAYAN NIKHARE