Bombay High CourtCAW/276/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Dr. Mrs. Vandana W/O Nandkishore Khedikar And Another v. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Through Its Registrar, Nagpur And Another

2015-02-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale2 pages

272caw276.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (C.A.W.) No. 276 of 2015 in WRIT PETITION No.273 OF 2014 (D) (Dr.(Mrs.) Vandana w/o. Nandkishore Khedikar .vs. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur and Ors.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.P.Bhandarkar, Adv. for the petitioners.

Mr.P.B.Patil, Adv. for respondent no.1.

Smt.A.P.Shinde, Adv. for respondent no.2.

CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : 27th FEBRUARY, 2015.

Heard.

The petitioners/applicants have taken out this application for direction to respondent no.1/University to decide their representation. Mr.S.P.Bhandarkar, learned Counsel for the petitioners/applicants submits that the Writ Petition was disposed of on 23.12.2014 with liberty to the petitioners to avail of the alternate remedy. Accordingly, representation has been filed and though period in excess of four months has expired, it has not been decided. Smt.A.P.Shinde, learned Counsel for respondent no.2 points out that there was no direction to decide the representation within the stipulated period and hence, the application in a disposed Writ Petition is misconceived. It is open to the petitioners to request the Authority before whom representation is pending to dispose

272caw276.15 of the same at the earliest. If cognizance is not taken, the petitioners can approach this Court in appropriate jurisdiction. Hence, we find the present application misconceived. It is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE jaiswal