← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/808/2024disposed off

Pramod Digambar Kalpande v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department Of Co-Operation, Mumbai And Others

2024-02-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri1 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:1476-DB

(1) 905 wp808.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.808 OF 2024 Pramod Digambar Kalpande Vs. State of Maharashtra & others ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Smruti Iyer, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. N.R.Patil, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATED : FEBRUARY 06, 2024.

1.

We are informed that in view of lapse of time and change in circumstances, the prayer for transfer of the appellate proceedings has rendered infructuous. However, it is claimed that the appellant's i.e. private respondent in this petition has preferred an appeal questioning the disqualification is pending consideration since December 2023 and as the impugned order is not in operation, the same be directed to be decided expeditiously. The petitioner claims that his intervention application in the pending appeal of respondent no.4 is not yet decided for last about 11 months and as such the hearing of the intervention application with that of the appeal be expedited.

2.

In the aforesaid background, we deem it appropriate to direct the Divisional Jt. Registrar, Cooperative Society, Amravati Division, Amravati, who is the appellate authority, to deal with the pending application for intervention, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within six weeks from today. 3.

In case, if the intervention application is allowed, it is open for the petitioner to move for expeditious disposal of the appeal before the same authority. 4.

The petition stands accordingly disposed of.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Ambulkar