Bombay High CourtWP/1020/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Sardar Vallabhabhai Patel, Bahuuddeshiya Gramin And Shahari Vikas Sanstha, Washim Thr Secretary v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Principal Secretary, Mumbai And Others

2016-04-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

wp1020.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1020/2016 Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Bahuuddeshiya Gramin and Sahakari Vikas Sanstha, Washim, through its Secretary ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. F. T. Mirza, Advocate for petitioner.

Mrs.R.Deshpande,Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 & 2 Mr. R. N. Badhe, Advocate for respondent no.3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 25, 2016 Heard.

It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that in almost identical set of facts, this Court has, by the order dated 04.04.2016, partly allowed Writ Petition No.4578/2015 and has directed the State Government to consider the recommendation of the respondent no.3-University on or before 31.05.2016 and communicate its outcome to the petitioner, immediately. It is stated that a similar order may be passed in this writ petition also.

Mrs. Deshpande, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the State Government does not dispute the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is admitted that in similar set of facts, this Court had directed the State Government to consider the proposal of the petitioner and decide the same before 31.05.2016. Hence, on parity, without observing anything on merits, we direct the State Government to process the

wp1020.16.odt recommendation of the respondent no.3-University in respect of the proposal of the petitioner before 31.05.2016 and communicate the decision to the petitioner, immediately. We direct the petitioner to remain present in the office of the State Government on 31.05.2016.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. A copy of this order may be supplied to the parties on request.

JUDGE JUDGE kahale