← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/901/2020disposedoff

Baliram S/O Tulshiram Lokhande v. The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati And Others

2022-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

1 920 wp 901.2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 901 OF 2020 Baliram s/o Tulshiram Lokhande ..vs..

The Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.D. Chopde, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Ukey, Addl. G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Shri A.S. Thotange, Advocate for respondent no. 4. CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED :

08/04/2022.

The petition is already dismissed in default against the respondent 3, since the learned Counsel for the petitioner did not supply the copy for issuing a fresh notice to respondent 3.

2.

Respondent 3 is a necessary party and its absence, there is no propriety in keeping alive the order of status-quo. 3.

Interim order dated 14.02.2020 was even otherwise to operate till the next date of hearing. It is clarified that there is no interim order operating.

4.

If the respondent 3 is not served within the next two weeks, the petition shall stand dismiss without further reference to Court.

JU DGE Trupti TRUPTI SANTOSHJI AGRAWAL 08.04.2022 18:41