M/S. Taori Marketing, Nagpur Thr. Its Partner, Satyanarayan S/O Champalalji Taori v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Pso Tahsil, Nagpur And Another

appa.67.16 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APPA] No.67 of 2016 (M/s. Taori Marketig, Itwari, Nagpur vs.

State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Tahasil, Nagpur and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri N.G. Jetha, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Shri C.N. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mrs. Ketki Joshi, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 12 th JULY, 2016.

Heard.

Prayer for condonation of delay is opposed by the learned Counsel for respondent No.2 on the ground that the delay is not properly explained.

Having regard to the fact that the applicant was pursuing the remedy before this Court in Writ Petition No.885/2014, which was disposed of on 21/01/2016 giving liberty to the applicant to take proper steps as are available in law, in my opinion, the delay needs to be condoned. The application stands allowed.

Post the matter for consideration on 26th July, 2016. Criminal Appeal No.______/2016 :

Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 26th July, 2016.

The learned A.P.P. waives notice for respondent No.1.

JUDGE *sdw