Raja Dinesh Narote v. State Of Mah. Through Pso, Police Station, M.I.D.C. Nagpur City
appa92.18 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.92/2018 Raja Dinesh Narote ..vs..
State of Mah., thr. PSO PS MIDC, Nagpur City (MS) ....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ....................................................................................................................................................... None for the applicant.
Shri Amit Madiwale, Addl.P.P. for the State.
CORAM
: V.M. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED : APRIL 12, 2018.
1.
Learned counsel for the applicant is absent. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri Amit Madiwale appears for the State. 2.
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against conviction.
3.
The applicant is convicted by learned Judge of the Court below for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 363, 366-A, and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code.
For the offence under Section 323, he is directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and, in default of payment of the fine amount, to suffer further simple imprisonment for 1 month.
For the offence under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code, he is directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- and, in default of payment of the fine amount, to .....2/-
appa92.18 2 suffer further simple imprisonment for 3 months. For the offence under Section 366-A, he is directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.3000/- and, in default of payment of the fine amount, to suffer further simple imprisonment for 3 months.
For the offence under Section 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, he is directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and, in default of payment of the fine amount, to suffer further simple imprisonment for 3 months. 4.
Since the applicant is in jail and since he wishes to challenge the judgment and order of conviction, it is my view that an opportunity should be granted to the applicant. Hence, the application is allowed. Delay of 256 days for filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 5.
The criminal application is disposed of accordingly. 6.
Office is directed to register the criminal appeal. JUDGE !! BRW !!
...../-