Bombay High CourtWP/1749/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri. Shrikant S/O. Mukundrao Nawlakhe v. Vice Chancellor, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Thr. Registrar And Others

2016-06-15Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1/1 wp1749.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 1749 OF 2016 Shrikant Mukundrao Nawlakhe -vsVice Chancellor, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, thr. Registrar and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ None for the petitioner.

Mr. A.M.Balpande, AGP for the respondent No.2. None for the respondent Nos.1 and 3.

Mr. Ambarish Joshi, counsel for the respondent Nos.4 to 6. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 15.06.2016.

The only prayer made by the petitioner is for the direction to the respondents to consider the representation made by the petitioner for his transfer from Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hiwra, District Gondia to Nagpur.

It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has mentioned his difficulties in the representation for seeking his transfer to Nagpur. It is stated that though it would be necessary for the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner, the respondents have not decided the same, till date. Since the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner was only for a direction to decide the representation, we had issued notice of final disposal to the respondents by the order, dated 01/04/2016 and all the respondents are duly served. However, none appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 3, though served. Since the prayer made by the petitioner is innocuous, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 3 to decide the representation of the petitioner as early as possible and positively within a period of three months. Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE