Shri. Ravindra S/O. Tukaram Hiwale v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Wadi, Nagpur And Others

CAO231-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.231/2016 IN C.A.O. NO.1480/2015 IN MCA NO.75/2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4058/2014 (D) (RAVINDRA TUKARAM HIWALE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The applicant-petitioner in person.

Ms A. Kulkarni. A.G.P. for the R-1.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 15 , 2016.

No ground has been made out for modification of the order dated 12.01.2016 passed in C.A. No.1480/2015 in M.C.A. St. No.14949/2015. The delay was not explained in C.A.O. No.1480/2015. Also, the conviction and the sentence of the applicant-petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 498 and 306 of the Indian Penal Code has been upheld till the Hon'ble Supreme Court and, hence, there is no question of reinstating the petitioner in service.

The civil application stands rejected.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE