← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/246/2025allowed

Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Mandal Nivrutta Karmachari Sangh, Thr. Its President Sahebrao S. Charde v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Chief Secretary, Mumbai And Others

2025-02-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:1184-DB

25. 5745 of 2018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.246/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5745/2018 Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Mandal Nivrutta Karmachari Sangh, Nagpur through its President Shri Sahebrao s/o Shankarrao Charde ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032 and others WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.253/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6950/2018 Maharashtra Rajya Vidyut Mandal Nivrutta Karmachari Sangh, Nagpur through its President Shri Ramnath s/o Shammana ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Department of Industry, Energy and Labour, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. S.P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner in WP No.5745/2018 Mr. A.V. Palshikar, AGP for respondent No.1 in both petitions Mr. A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 6 in WP No.5745/2018 Mrs. Gauri Venkatraman, Advocate for petitioner in WP No.6950/2018 Mr. A.D. Mohgaonkar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 5 in WP No.6950/2018 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 06/02/2025 1.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner/applicant contended that the petitioner could not file written notes of argument in time. Therefore, he filed an application to permit him to file the written notes on record.

2.

Considering the reasons stated in the application, we permit the petitioner to file written notes of argument on record by the next date.

3.

The civil application is allowed and disposed of

25. 5745 of 2018.odt accordingly. No order as to costs.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.252/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5745/2018 1.

By this application, respondents Nos. 3 to 6 seek further time to submit written notes of argument, as the learned Advocate for respondents Nos.3 to 6 could not prepare the same in time.

2.

Having considered the reasons stated in para 3 of the application, we grant two more weeks to file written notes of argument on record. The civil application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. No costs.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.253/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6950/2018 1.

Respondents Nos. 2 to 5 moved this application seeking permission to extend the time to submit written notes of argument, as the learned Advocate for respondents Nos.2 to 5 could not prepare them in time.

2.

Having considered the reasons stated in para 3 of the application, we grant two more weeks to file written notes of argument on record. The civil application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. No costs.

WRIT PETITION NO.5745/2018 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6950/2018 Stand over to 27/02/2025.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar