← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2883/2018dismissed

Sahakar Maharashi Dadasaheb Deotale Sahakari Cotton Ginning Pressing And Oil Proecessing Soc. Ltd. v. Asstt. Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Nagpur

2023-03-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

16-wp-2883-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition (WP) No. 2883 of 2018 Sahakar Maharshi Dadasaheb Deotale

Versus

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri A.J.Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.R.Prasad, Advocate for the sole-respondent. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED : 15th MARCH, 2023.

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that imposition of quantum of damages was under challenge in this writ petition and the challenge was based on judgment of Full Bench of Delhi High Court in a case of Roma Henny Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Trustees, E.P.F. Organization through Assistant P.F. Commissioner, Delhi (North)1 which has been reversed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case of Central Board of Trustees Vs. Roma Henny Security Services Pvt. Ltd., and others2. He, therefore, submits that basis of the challenge does not survive after 2013-I-LLJ-29(Del) (2020) 3 SCT 741 SKNair

16-wp-2883-18.odt the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been reversed the judgment of Full Bench of Delhi High Court in the case of Roma Henny Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Board of Trustees, (supra). Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as dismissed.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] by SACHINDANAND K NAIR Date: 2023.03.21 18:59:21 +0530 SACHINDANAND K NAIR SKNair