Bombay High CourtFCA/167/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Sau. Megha W/O Vilas Ahirkar v. Vilas S/O Chudaman Ahirkar And Another

2015-09-22Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre1 pages

FCA167-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 167/2014 (MEGHA VILAS AHIRKAR VERSUS VILAS CHUDAMAN AHIRKAR & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri B.M. Kharkate, counsel for the appellant. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 22 , 2015.

Shri Kharkate, the learned counsel for the appellant, states that despite the service of the notice to the appellant by the counsel, the appellant has not contacted the counsel and has not instructed him. It is stated that the counsel has no instructions in the matter.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE