Smt. Santosh Rani W/O Ramprakash Arora, Through Her P.O.A. Shri Dharmeshkumar S/O Ramprakash Arora v. The Honblemember, Maharashtra State Co-Operative Appellate Court, Mumbai And Another

Note St.1091-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR NOTE ST. NO. 1091/2015 IN L.P.A. NO. 73/2012 IN W.P. NO.3549/2011 (SANTOSH RANI RAMPRAKASH ARORA VERSUS THE HON'BLE MEMBER, M.S.CO-OP. APPELLATE COURT, MUMBAI & ANOTHER) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.V. Samarth, counsel for the appellant. Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri V.N. Gaoli, counsel for the R-2.

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 23 , 2015.

The appellant has moved for speaking to minutes of the order.

The learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute that there has been a typographical mistake in the order. As such, the motion is allowed. The necessary correction as per the pursis, which is marked Exhibit 'X' for identification, be carried out.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE