Ku. Sudarshani D/O Damduji Thul, Now Sudarshani W/O Dnyaneshwar Taksande v. Siddhartha Rupchand Meshram And Another

cp56of18inwp1347of01.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION 56 OF 2018 IN CAW 1395OF2015 IN WRIT PETITION 4347 OF 2006 (Ku. Sudarshani d/o. Damduji Thul, now Sudarshani w/o. Dnyaneshwar Taksande..vs.. Shri Siddhartha Rupchand Meshram & anr, ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Smt. S.W. Deshpande, counsel for petitioner.

Shri N.R. Saboo, counsel for respondents.

CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE : 3 rd September, 2018 Heard.

In view of the submission of the Education Officer and the Management that by and under the order dated 12.9.2017, the petitioner is entitled to the benefits from 1.3.1999 till 31.5.2013, and therefore, the grievance of the petitioner that she is entitled to benefits from 1.2.1997 can not be the subject matter of this contempt petition, the learned counsel for the contempt petitioner Smt. S.W. Deshapnde, does not press the contempt petition. Smt. S.W. Deshapnde, the learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner be granted liberty to institute appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum in respect of the claim which is not covered by the

cp56of18inwp1347of01.odt 2 order of the Hon'ble High Court. If the petitioner is entitled in law to lodge such claim, she is free to do so and it would not be necessary to grant liberty in this proceeding. The contempt petition is disposed of.

JUDGE RSB