← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/813/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Ravindra Subhash Raut And Others v. Maharashtra State Examination Board Of Secondary Education, Nagpur Division And 3 Others

2016-02-03Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP813-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 813/2015 (RAVINDRA SUBHASH RAUT & OTHERS VERSUS MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, NAGPUR & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the petitioners.

Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the R-1.

Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional G.P. for the R-2 & 3. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 03 , 2016.

By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondent no.1-Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education, Nagpur to accept the examination form of the petitioners for Summer-2015 examination, without late fees. This Court had, by an order dated 16.02.2015, issued notice to the respondents, however, no interim relief was granted in favour of the petitioners.

Shri Parchure, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1, states that the cause for filing the writ petition is rendered infructuous as the only prayer made by the petitioners was for a direction to the respondent no.1 to permit the petitioners at the Summer-2015 examination, without late fees. It is submitted that the Summer-2015 examinations are conducted and thereafter, the Winter-2015 examinations are also conducted.

We find much force in the submission made on behalf of the respondent no.1. Hence, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE