Bombay High CourtBA/89/2016rejected

Aashish @ Chapari S/O Narendra Gajbhiye v. State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S. Tumsar, Bhandara

2016-03-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 ba89.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO.89/2016 Aashish @ Chapari S/o Narendra Gajbhiye ..Versus..

State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Tumsar, Tah. Tumsar, Distt. Bhandara - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 10.3.2016 Heard Shri Mir Nagman Ali, advocate for the applicant and Shri N.S. Khubalkar, A.P.P. for the non-applicant. The applicant is arrested in crime registered against 10 persons (including the applicant) for the offence punishable under Section 307, 302, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian penal Code and under Section 3/25 of the Indian Arms Act.

The application is opposed by the learned A.P.P. on the ground that the victim has named the applicant and the name of applicant is in the F.I.R., that there is ample material against the applicant and that he is a history-sheeter. The learned A.P.P. has pointed out the chart

2 ba89.16 showing the number of crimes registered against the applicant. Considering the nature of incident, nature of accusations against the applicant, I am not inclined to show indulgence at this stage. The application is rejected with liberty to the applicant to move fresh application after three months, if so advised. JUDGE Tambaskar.