← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1192/2019disposed off

Mariya Anjum Mohd Akil v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secretary Urban Development Dept. Mumbai And Others

2021-09-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

Judgment wp1192.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 20 Mariya Anjum Mohd. Akil, aged about 20 years, Occu: Nil, R/o. Atarpura, Ward No.10, Darwha,Tq.Darwha,Distt. Yavatmal .... PETITIONER.

// VERSUS //

1. The State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The Commissioner and Director, Municipal Administration, Shaskiya Parivahan Seva Imarat, 3rd Floor, Sir Pochkhanwala Road, Worli, Mumbai - 30.

3. The Collector, Yavatmal.

4. The Municipal Council, Darwha, Through Chief Officer, Darwha, Tq. Darwha, Distt. Yavatmal.

.... RESPONDENT S .

______________________________________________________________ Shri Anand Deshpande, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri D.P.Thakre, Addl. G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Rahul Tajne, Advocate for Respondent No.4. ______________________________________________________________ CORAM :

SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND ANIL S. KILOR , JJ.

DATED :

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

Judgment wp1192.19.odt ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per : Sunil B. Shukre, J.) 1.

Heard.

2.

RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3.

Considering the fact that a proposal for grant of approval to appoint the petitioner and other 9 eligible persons on compassionate basis, dated 08/03/2019 has been forwarded to respondent No.3 and it is still pending with respondent No.3, we are of the view that the purposes for this petition would be served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No.2. Accordingly, we direct respondent No.3 to decide the proposal, dated 08/03/2019, wherein name of the petitioner appears at Sr.No.9, in accordance with law and the applicable Rules, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the order.

Rule accordingly. No costs.

( ANIL S. KILOR, J ) ( SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) RRaut..