Attaullah Khan S/O Latifullah Khan And Others v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Officer-In-Charge Of P.S. Pimpalgaon Raja, Buldhana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY:

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No. 119 of 2015 [Attaullah Khan Latifullah Khan & two others Vs. State of Mah.] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's `orders.

Mr. H.R. Gadhia, Adv., for the applicants.

Mrs. Joshi, APP for respondent sole.

Mr. S.D. Chande, Adv., for intervener.

----

CORAM

:

A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.

DATE :

18th June, 2015.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.

Para 5 of the impugned order is reproduced below:- "5.

Applicants in para 5 of application alleged that after said incident on number of times they had requested police authority to record their statements but police avoided on one pretext or the other and did not record their statements. In spite of it the applicants did not make any complaint to S.P. or approach to the court when charge sheet was filed. Surprisingly they kept mum for long period of 7 years and suddenly emerged when case is part heard."

I am satisfied that the impugned order is

legal, correct and proper.

Rejected.

Judge |hedau|