Bombay High CourtWP/907/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Sevakram S/O Mahadeo Tathod v. State Of Mah. Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Co-Ordination, Marketing And Textile, Mumbai And 3

2015-10-27Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

WP907-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 907/2015 (SEVAKRAM MAHADEO TATHOD VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.G. Kavimandan, counsel for the petitioner. Shri D.B. Patel, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 4.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 27 , 2015.

Shri Kavimandan, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause for filing the writ petition has been rendered infructuous due to passage of time.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE