← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/512/2013admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Dr. Ishrat Ullah Khan S/O Muzaffarullah Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Secty And ORS

2015-01-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale2 pages

caw512.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR

BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.512 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4474 OF 2012 Dr. Ishrat Ullah Khan S/o Muzaffar Ullah Khan ..vs..

The State of Mah., thr its Secretary, Department of Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri A.B. Mirza, counsel for the applicant/R-5. Shri A.S. Fulzele, AGP for non-applicants/R-1 to 3. Shri A.R. Sheikh, counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.S. Sanyal, counsel for non-applicant/R-4. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 16, 2015.

Heard.

Prayer is to speaking to minutes.

Seen the copy of Application No.680 of 2012 produced in writ petition along with additional affidavit by respondent No.5 - Amin Ahmad Khan.

It is apparent that the said application is moved against the proposed intervenor by Abdul .....2/-

caw512.13 Razzak S/o Abdul Kadar and three other persons. In this situation, words "proposed intervenor", as appearing in second line at Page No.6 of Judgment dated 13.2.2013 in Writ Petition No.4474 of 2012, are substituted by words "against intervenor".

The civil application is accordingly allowed and disposed.

JUDGE JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-