← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/81/2014dismissedrule discharged

Smt. Tarabai Nilkanth Walde v. Pratima Nilkanth Walde

2015-08-26Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

fca81.14 1/1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.81 OF 2014 Smt. Tarabai Wd/o Nilkanth Walde -vsKu. Pratima D/o Nilkanth Walde ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ None for the appellant.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 26.08.2015.

None had appeared on behalf of the appellant on 19/08/2015.

We were prima facie of the view that an appeal would not lie against the order impugned in this appeal in view of the provisions of Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, as the impugned order is an interlocutory order. We had directed the Registry to verify the position. The Registrar (Judicial) has, by the note, dated 25/08/2015 conveyed to the Court that no appeal or revision would lie against the impugned order and it would be necessary for the appellant to file a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Since the appeal is not tenable and since none had appeared on behalf of the appellant on the previous date of hearing and also today, we dismiss the Family Court Appeal with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE