Yayati Uddhav Bokade v. The Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary, Gadchiroli And Another

2025:BHC-NAG:1528-DB 1 915.wp.892.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 892/2017 Yayati Uddhav Bokade Vs.

The Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny Committee and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. P. R. Parsodkar, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. I. J. Damle, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1/State. Ms Neerja Chaubey, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 14/02/2025.

.

The pursis tendered by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the petition as he intends to move for protection of service. Since the petitioner has accepted, the impugned order thereby rejecting his tribe claim, the petition stands dismissed.

2.

As regards the protection of service is concerned, the prayer if so made before the Employer, the same be dealt in accordance with the law.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule