Roshan Pandurang Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Teosa,

appa160.19 12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.160/2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.101/2019 Roshan Pandurang Patil ..vs..

The State of Mah., thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Teosa, Taluka Teosa, District Amravati ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Shri A.D.Tote, Counsel for the Applicant.

Shri A.D.Sonak, Addl.P.P. for the State.

CORAM

: V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : MAY 3, 2019.

1.

This is an application for suspension of substantive jail sentence and for grant of bail. 2.

By judgment and order of conviction dated 27.4.2018 passed by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.150/2017, the applicant is convicted for for offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years.

3.

Heard learned counsel Shri A.D.Tote for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri A.D.Sonak for the State. Also, I have perused reply filed on behalf of the State opposing the present application. 4.

During Trial, the applicant was not on bail.

5.

Looking to nature of injuries, mentioned by .....2/-

appa160.19 12 learned Judge below in paragraph No.14, I am of the view that this is not a fit case wherein the Court should exercise its discretion for grant of bail in favour of the present applicant. Hence, the criminal application stands rejected and disposed of as such.

JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-