Purushottam Bapurao Raibole v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Police Station Officer Daryapur Dist. Amravati

aba87.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.87/2018 Purushottam Bapurao Raibole ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through PSO P.S. Daryapur, Dist. Amravati.

_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. F. T. Mirza, Advocate for applicant.

Mr. T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for non applicant-State. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 21, 2018 1.

Heard Mr. F. T. Mirza, Advocate for applicant and Mr. T. A. Mirza, A.P.P. for non applicant-State. 2.

This Court had on 12.02.2018, looking to the nature of accusation made and looking to the fact that the victim-complainant is in habit of making complaints against various persons, granted ad interim relief to the applicant on a condition that the applicant shall attend Police Station on 17.02.2018 and 18.02.2018 and shall be with the investigating officer from 02.00 p.m. to 05.00 p.m. 3.

According to the learned A.P.P., the applicant has attended the police station and his statement is already recorded.

4.

The Court is not powerless merely because there is provision of Section 18 of the Act especially when it is

aba87.18.odt noticed by the Court that the complainant is in habit of making complaints against various persons.

5.

Looking to the nature of accusation made against the present applicant, I confirm the order dated 12.02.2018. The applicant shall attend Police Station as and when called by the police Station Officer, by giving a clear cut 48 hours written communication.

The application is disposed of.

JUDGE kahale