← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/377/2025allowed

Anuj Kishore Prasad S/O Jaleshwar Prasad v. Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry Of Finance Dept., New Delhi And ORS.

2025-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:1829-DB

03. CAW 377 of 2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.377/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6441/2024 Anuj Kishore Prasad s/o Jaleshwar Prasad ...Versus...

Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, New Delhi 110001 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. I.S. Charlewar and Mr. K.E. Meshram, Advocates for the petitioner/applicant Mr. Bhushan Mohta, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Shahir Ansari, Advocate h/f Mr. V.S. Uberoi, Advocate for respondent No.8 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 24/02/2025 1.

Heard.

2.

The petitioner/applicant moved this application to correct the name of respondent No.7, as the bailiff report shows that his name is not correct. Therefore, he has prayed for permitting him to add his father's name to the petition. 3.

Learned Advocate for respondents Nos.2 and 8 have no objection to the same.

4.

Having considered the same and for the reasons stated in the application, the civil application is allowed, as prayed. The petitioner/applicant is directed to carry out the amendment forthwith and supply a copy of the amended petition to the other side.

03. CAW 377 of 2025.odt 5.

Upon carrying out the amendment, fresh notice be issued to respondent No.7, returnable after two weeks. 6.

The petitioner is permitted to serve respondent No.7 by all modes of service permissible in law, including Hamdast.

7.

The civil application stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar