Dineshchandra Rameshchandra Laddha Prop. M/S. Kisan Krushi Kendra, v. State Of Maharashtra Rep. By Shri Dadaso Vyankat Pawar

1 apl163.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.163 OF 2019 (Dineshchandra Rameshchandra Laddha ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, represented by Shri Dadaso Vyankat Pawar) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Muhammed Ateeque, Counsel for the applicant, Shri T.A. Mirza, Addl.P.P. for the non-applicant/State. CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 03-07-2019 Heard.

2.

This Court was not inclined to entertain this petition since there is nothing on record to show that the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the complaint.

4.

At this Stage, the learned Counsel for the petitioner Shri Muhammed Ateeque seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take such steps as would be necessary, if cognizance is taken.

5.

With liberty, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition.

6.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

2 apl163.19 7.

Needless to say that every contention raised in the petition is kept expressly open.

JUDGE adgokar