Bombay High CourtCAF/1609/2014admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

The Executive Engineer, Khadkpurna Project Division, Buldhana v. Dnyandeo Sakharam Shingne And 2 Others

2015-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq3 pages

1 caf1609.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.F. NO.1609/2014 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.2332/2014 Executive Engineer, Khadakpurna Project Division, Deulgaon Raja ..Versus..

Dnyandeo Sakharam Shingne and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 2.3.2015 Heard Shri S.S. Godbole, the learned advocate for the applicant, Shri K.S. Narwade, the learned advocate for the non-applicant no.1 and Ms. Taywade, the learned A.G.P. for the non-applicants 2 and 3.

For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that it is

2 caf1609.14 not opposed by the non-applicants inasmuch as reply is not filed by the non-applicants, the delay of 42 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The civil application is disposed of.

FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.2332/2014 Taken up on board for admission by the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties.

Admit.

Shri Narwade, the learned advocate waives notice for the respondent no.1.

Ms. Taywade, the learned A.G.P., waives notice for the respondents 2 and 3.

The private paper book is dispensed with.

C.A.F. NO.83/2015.

The learned advocates for the respective parties submit that in the connected appeals arising out of the same order which is challenged in this appeal, this Court has permitted the

3 caf1609.14 respondent - land owner to withdraw 50% of the amount deposited by the appellant on furnishing surety to the satisfaction of the Reference Court and balance 50% of the amount is permitted to be withdrawn on filing an undertaking to the satisfaction of the Reference Court that in case the appeal is allowed, the respondent shall repay the amount withdrawn by him with interest as would be determined by the Court, within the stipulated time. The respondent no.1 is permitted to withdraw the amount in the above terms.

JUDGE Tambaskar.