Bombay High CourtABA/90/2015rejected

Kamlakar Dashrath Vairagade v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Pso Gittikhadan, Nagpur

2015-04-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.B. Varale1 pages

aba.90.15 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [ABA] No.90 of 2015 (Kamlakar Dashrath Vairagade vs.

The State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. Gittikhadan, Nagpur) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

CORAM

: PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.

DATE : APRIL 20, 2015.

None for the applicant.

The office record shows that on 07/04/2015, time was granted to the learned Counsel for removal of office objections within a period of one week. Till today, neither objections are removed nor the applicant is represented. The present application is for seeking protection in the nature of pre-arrest bail. The material placed on record shows that on 22nd December, 2014, the application filed by the applicant before the learned Sessions Judge, Nagpur seeking similar relief was rejected. It seems that neither the applicant is interested in prosecuting the application nor there is any apprehension justified. The application is thus rejected. JUDGE *sdw