← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1114/2020dismissed

Anant @ Abhijit S/O Rameshrao Chaudhari v. Digambar S/O Vishwanathrao Chaudhari And Others

2023-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

2023:BHC-NAG:16555 35.wp.1114.20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1114 OF 2020 Anand @ Abhijit S/o Rameshrao Chaudhari .Vs. Digambar S/o Vishwanathrao Chaudhari and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri K.P. Mahalle, Advocate for petitioner.

Shri A.S. Dhore, Advocate for respondents.

CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED : 28/11/2023 1.

In the present matter, the application moved by the plaintiff for recasting the issues came to be partially rejected vide order dated 20.11.2019 passed by the 3rd Civil Judge Junior Division, Darwha in RCS No. 152 of 2012, the same is the subject matter of the present writ petition. 2.

After going through the impugned order, it is apparent that, the Court has considered the prayer of the plaintiff for recasting of the issues and thereby to frame four additional issues. However, considering the nature of pleading and the controversy involved, the Court has arrived at a conclusion that, the only issues which would suffice the purpose is as follows:

"Whether the plaintiff proves that he is entitled for protection of his possession on the basis of doctrine of part performance of contract ?" C.L. Dhakate

35.wp.1114.20.odt 3.

Thus, considering the pleading made by the plaintiff in the suit and the pleading made by the defendant in the written statement and the actual controversy involved, I do not find any error committed by the learned trial Court in passing the impugned order dated 20.11.2019. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

JUDGE C.L. Dhakate