Bombay High CourtABA/100/2016allowed

Khurshid Ahmad Rakimullah @ Munna Khan v. State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. Kalamna, Nagpur

2016-03-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 aba100.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 100 OF 2016 (KHURSHID AHMAD RAKIMULLAH @ MUNNA KHAN...VS..STATE OF MAH., THR. PSO, PS KALAMNA, DIST. NAGPUR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : MARCH 15, 2016.

Heard Shri H.G.Katekar, advocate for the applicant and Shri A.D.Sonak, A.P.P. for the non-applicant. The applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail in the crime registered by the non-applicant against him for the offences punishable under Sections 407 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. The accusations against the applicant are that Toor Dal has been seized from the godown of the applicant. The Toor Dal is alleged to be belonging to the complainant.

Considering the nature of the accusations, the facts on record and as the non-applicant has not been able to show that the custody of the applicant is required for further investigation, in my view, the interim order granted on 23rd February, 2016 has to be confirmed.

Hence, the following order :

2 aba100.16 In the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.387 of 2015 registered by the non-applicant, the applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.Twenty Thousand with one solvent surety in the like amount.

The application is allowed accordingly.

CRI. APPLN. NO.223/2016.

In view of disposal of the main application, the application for dispensing with certified copy of order and say of APP does not survive, hence, it is disposed of. JUDGE RRaut..