← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6667/2023disposedoff

The Superintendent Engineer, Command Area Devpt. Authority (Cada), Ajani, Nagpur And Others v. Sau. Sonali W/O Lokesh Choudhary (Sonali D/O Gulabrao Aambulkar) And Another

2023-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

13.wp6667.2023.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6667 OF 2023 (The Superintendent Engineer, Command Area Development Authority, Nagpur and Others....Vs... Sau. Sonali w/o. Lokesh Choudhary and another) *********************************************************************************** Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

*********************************************************************************** Mr. Tariq Mohd. Zaheer, advocate for petitioners. Mr. S.B. Dhande, advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. N.S. Rao, AGP for respondent No.2/State.

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 28-11-2023 This petition questions the judgment dated 16.11.2021, passed by the learned Industrial Court No.1, Nagpur whereby the present respondent has been directed to be given appointment on compassionate basis within two months from the date of the order.

2.

It is not disputed by Mr. S.B. Dhande, the learned counsel for respondent No.1 as well as Mr. N.S.Rao, the learned AGP for respondent No.2 that the petitioner in such a circumstance is required to maintain a list of wait listed candidates for compassionate appointment, in view of which, the learned Industrial Court could not have directed appointment of respondent No.1 on compassionate basis. All that could have been done was to include the name of respondent No. 1 in the wait list.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties are agreeable that the impugned judgment will have to be modified by directing inclusion of name of respondent No.1 in the

13.wp6667.2023.

waiting list maintained by the petitioners for compassionate appointments, the relevant date being the date of application by the respondent No.1.

4.

The impugned order is therefore, modified in the above terms and the petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Belkhede