Bombay High CourtWP/1275/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

M/S. Punya Coal Roadlines A Proprietary Concern Thr.Its Auth. Signatory Shailendra Shikharchand Jai v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary, Finance Department And 2 Others

2016-02-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

1 wp1275.15+5.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1275 OF 2015 [M/s. Punya Coal Roadlines .vs. State of Maharashtra and others] with WRIT PETITION NO.1325 OF 2015 [M/s. N.N. Agencies .vs. State of Maharashtra and others] with WRIT PETITION NO.1330 OF 2015 [M/s. Caem India Shelving Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and others] with WRIT PETITION NO.1332 OF 2015 [Vidarbha Hygiene Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and others] with WRIT PETITION NO.1497 OF 2015 [M/s. Prathyusha Timbers .vs. State of Maharashtra and others] with WRIT PETITION NO.1498 OF 2015 [Gammon India Limited .vs.

State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Aditya Gohokar, counsel for the petitioners, Shri N.S. Rao, Mrs. A.R. Kulkarni and Mrs. M.S. Naik, Assistant Government Pleaders for the respondents-State.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2016.

Heard.

By these writ petitions, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to carry out the assessment as per the returns filed by the petitioners for the period from April-2011 to March-2012. The petitioners have also sought the refund of the amount after the completion of the assessment. Shri Gohokar, the learned counsel for the petitioners states, on instructions, that the assessment for the year 2011-2012 has been completed by the respondents and the grievance of the petitioners in that regard stands redressed.

2 wp1275.15+5.odt It is stated that the petitioners would take appropriate steps in terms of the assessment orders.

In view of the statement recorded herein above, the writ petitions are disposed of, with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande