Ganga Iron And Steel Trading Com Ltd. Thr Its Director Mr Mukesh Omprakashji Agrawal, Nagpur v. Madhu Kandunni Nair
2025:BHC-NAG:6969 958-958D.wp.95.25+ors..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.95 OF 2025 (Ganga Iron and Steel Trading Company Ltd. Vs. Madhu Kandunni Nair and anr.) WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.97 OF 2025 (Ganga Iron and Steel Trading Company Limited Vs. Madhu Kandunni Nair and ors.) WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.96 OF 2025 (Ganga Iron and Steel Trading Company Limited Vs Madhu Kandunni Nair and ors.) WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.176 OF 2025 (Ganga Iron and Steel Trading Company Ltd. thr its Director Vs. Madhu Kandunni Nair & ors.) WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.177 OF 2025 (Ganga Iron and Steel Trading Company Limited thr. Its Director Vs. Madhu Kandunni Nair) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.J. Dhanrajani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Deo, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED :- JULY 16, 2025.
By the Pursis dated 15/07/2025, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vishnoo Mittal Vs. Shakti Trading Company [2025 SCC OnLine SC 558] wherein it has ruled that in case if the moratorium is imposed before the cause of action for initiating proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, then the Directors of the company cannot be prosecuted, as due to imposition of moratorium, the directors of the company are no more in charge of the affairs of the company and as
958-958D.wp.95.25+ors..odt such are not responsible regarding dishonour of cheque. 2.
In view of that, learned Counsel the petitioner seeking withdrawal of all the petitions.
3.
All the petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) *Divya