Sukhdeo Mahadeo Kamble v. Central Provident Fund Commissioner, Employee Provident Fund Organisation (Ho) And Other
0604caw729.14.odt 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 729 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3195 OF 2012 (Sukhdeo Mahadeo Kamble Vs. Central Provident Fund & others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A. M. Sudame, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND S. B. SHUKRE, JJ.
DATED : 06 APRIL, 2015 The petition is of the year 2012 and is still not admitted. The challenge arises out of Pension Adalat and computation thereof. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that seven such matters were placed at the end of the Board for final hearing. In this situation, the amendment proposed to be brought on record by way of subsequent events is allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out within one week.
Liberty to the respondents to carry out consequential amendment or to file additional affidavit within further period of three weeks.
C. A. disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE wwl